2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

Claim:

However, since 2010, the defendant does not seem to have demanded the plaintiff to return the certificate of registration. 7) The defendant used almost all of the loans executed on two occasions as collateral the apartment of this case. The defendant refers to the debtor of the right to collateral security established on the apartment of this case as the defendant, but it is insufficient to deny the plaintiff's actual right to dispose of the apartment of this case. Furthermore, according to the recording (Evidence A No. 14) in which dialogue between the plaintiff and the defendant between the plaintiff and the defendant is recorded, "A has obtained a loan of 30 million won. It is necessary to make this security. The president of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of this case as security."

d. Sheet mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar.

3. The Plaintiff stated that “A person who does not and written within his house with his house written off the money, must be his superior,” and the content of this conversation shows that the Plaintiff has the right to dispose of the instant apartment.

8) The Defendant’s family members and relatives (Aber Q, Mai TU, Mai TU, Ma third degree W) submitted a confirmation document to the effect that the Plaintiff’s family members and relatives were the same as the Plaintiff’s assertion, or testified at the court of first instance (Evidence A No. 8) at the court of first instance (Evidence A). 9) In the record No. 14 of the record, on May 6, 2012, on which dialogue between the Plaintiff, the Defendant and the Defendant and their relatives recorded, the Defendant, C made an effort to the Plaintiff, and even thereafter, made efforts to pay attention to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff’s burden of interest on the loans between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, and the background as to the monetary help received from the Plaintiff.