공무상표시은닉등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. As to the invalidity of indication in the line of duty (misunderstanding of facts or misapprehension of legal principles), in full view of C’s statement and empirical rule, the Defendant was well aware of the attachment of the released goods of this case, and it was clearly aware that there was a indication of compulsory disposition, such as the list at the time of shipment.
must be viewed.
As to embezzlement, it is clearly confirmed that the Defendant agreed to return the shipment goods of this case by the documentary evidence of this case, which is a disposal document, and thus, the Defendant is granted the premise that the Defendant will return the shipment goods of this case not by receiving the shipment goods of this case for the purpose of collateral but by returning them
Therefore, even if each of the facts charged in this case is found guilty, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal doctrine, thereby acquitted each of the facts charged in this case.
2. The summary of the facts charged in this case is that C is a person who is engaged in the chemical distribution business, the Defendant is a person who is engaged in the oral plant processing business. C’s creditor D 970 metreds, 970 metreds, shot (debred), 500 metreds, 245 metreds, 23 metreds, 428 mets of the U.S. 1, 428 metreds, 428 metreds, 503 metreds, 503 metreds, 2,669 mets, etc. (the instant seized goods) held by C on January 15, 2014 (hereinafter “the instant seized goods”). The execution officer attached the attachment to E.
A. While the Defendant and C did not receive oral processing expenses supplied to C, the Defendant demanded the payment of unpaid obligations on February 16, 2014, and demanded that the Defendant be aware of the payment of the unpaid obligations, even if the instant seizure was carried out, the Defendant would bring the instant seizure to his employees and be aware of it.
C, at any time, will take the delivery certificate to return the above goods at the request of the defendant.