If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

On December 23, 2015, the Defendant: within the “C” restaurant located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul on December 23, 2015; within the “C” restaurant; after receiving a report from 112 that the audience was sound, the Defendant sent out to the site after receiving a report from the head of the police station affiliated with the Seoul Young-gu police station D police station, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul; and “ponners must be changed, and police, respectively.

The term "domination" and "domination was made by assaulting the face of E five times in his/her hands, and the face of E in his/her hand is pushed ahead of it.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as photographs, etc. of damage and investigation reports (for injury E-mailed by a victim);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of a fine to choose a sentence (the fact that a police officer, who is the public authority, commits a crime that disturbs public order, the degree of assault is not less severe, but the liability for the crime is an contingent crime under the influence of alcohol, the fact that the crime is recognized and reflects in depth, the defendant and the defendant's parents endeavor seriously to recover damage, such as taking the damaged police officer several times, and the fact that there is no record of such crime, etc.);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;