2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the entirety of the instant crimes and reflected his mistake, and that the health conditions such as alcohol addiction and exchange hall are not good, and that the Defendant’s driving vehicle is subscribed to liability insurance.

However, the instant narcotics crime is a case where the Defendant committed one time at hopon medication, and the Defendant was sentenced to multiple times as narcotics crimes, and there is a need to strictly punish and eradicate the relevant narcotics crimes in light of the addiction of narcotics and the harm caused by the distribution medication of narcotics. Although the Defendant had already been investigated by an investigation agency due to the crime of taking the hopon medication, the Defendant takes an additional hopon medication even though he had already been investigated by the investigation agency, and the Defendant, even though he was found to have caused the first traffic accident while driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol, caused the injury to the victim, who is the other vehicle, by driving the vehicle at the same time on the same day and causing the second traffic accident even though he was discovered to have been under the control of the drunk driving, and the Defendant has already been sentenced to criminal punishment, including the multiple times of punishment for narcotics crimes, and then committed the instant crime despite the fact that each of the instant crimes was committed during the period of the repeated crime, the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, the method and method of the crime and the sentencing guidelines of the sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so ordered.