beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.02.06 2013고정828

상해

Text

The accused shall dismiss an application for compensation by the applicant for compensation of the acquitted;

Reasons

1. Around 14:00 on May 23, 2012, the Defendant, on the first floor of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, inflicted an injury on the victim C, the representative of the occupant of the aforementioned DDDDDDD, and on the cost of the repair of sewage, he/she incurred an injury on the victim, by her hand, such as plucking and digging up the victim’s left hand hand hand, and making the victim once he/she was drinking.

2. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, there are statements by each victim, bodily injury photographs and written diagnosis of each injury to the victim.

The injured party stated at an investigative agency that the accused was plicking or plicking his left hand while breaking up the accused at the time and place indicated in the above facts charged, and that the accused was frighted to drinking after booming the injured party, and that the accused was made a statement that corresponds to the above facts charged.

However, the following circumstances revealed by the records of this case: (a) the Defendant consistently stated that there was no injury to the victim from the investigative agency to the present court; (b) the victim told the Defendant that he had consistently committed the injury to the victim; (c) the victim was going to go to the police box after coming to go to the police box; (d) the Defendant went to the village bus after going to the police box; and (e) the Defendant got to go to the E box after going to go to the police box; (e) if there was a situation such as the injury photograph submitted by the victim as evidence at the time, the victim would not have been in a situation where the victim would go to or go to the village bus along with the Defendant; and (e) the Defendant and the victim could not have been urged to go to go to a compromise at the police box; and (e) the F who observed the dispute at the time and place indicated in the facts charged at the investigative agency.