When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2015. 2. 11. 12:10경 경남 양산시 메기로 270에 있는 부산대양산캠퍼스역 앞 도로 2차로에서 누워있던 중 112신고를 받고 출동한 양산경찰서 B지구대 소속 경사 C로부터 도로에서 일어날 것을 요구받자 위 C에게 "짭새야, 네가 뭔데 지랄이고"라고 말하며 주먹으로 위 C의 얼굴을 1회 때리고 그 자리에서 일어나 위 C의 우측 견장에 있던 무전기를 잡아 바닥에 던진 후 발로 위 C의 다리를 수 회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on internal investigation (to attach photographs of parts to be damaged by a site and victim, on the site, and photographs of damaged police officers);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant asserted that the Defendant was in a state of mental disorder by failing to drink any brupt, even though he had been proven to have been dead at the time of the instant case.

According to the records, even though the fact that the defendant suffered from mental illness, such as the unknown physical disorder at the time of the instant case, it is difficult to view that the defendant had a weak ability to discern things at the time of the instant crime or make decisions, in light of the background leading to the instant crime, specific method of crime, the defendant's behavior and attitude before and after the instant crime, and the statement of the defendant as to the crime.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted.

The reason for sentencing does not seem to have been a state of mental disorder, but it is the influence of detailed stimulative disorder, etc.