2. Considering that the grounds for sentencing indicated in the argument and record of the instant case, namely, the Defendant’s history of identical crimes, and each of the instant crimes was committed during the period of repeated crimes, and narcotics crimes were committed repeatedly over a long period of time and have great harm to society, the lower court’s sentencing appears to be reasonably determined by fully considering the Defendant’s reflectivity and investigation cooperation degree, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., and there are no special circumstances to the extent that the sentencing changes ex post facto. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion of unreasonable sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.