Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

On October 14, 2016, the Defendant, as a person who has lost the ability to discern things or make decisions due to a divesive disorder, was the driver of CNF car, and on October 14, 2016, the Defendant changed the two lanes from the two-lane to the three-lane distance distance of high school from the first apartment site located on the side of the Busan Shipping Daegu Metropolitan Government, Busan Metropolitan City, into the two-lane.

The Defendant, while driving a motor vehicle following a change in course, was driving the motor vehicle following the change in course.

DST5 Vehicle E (SM9 tax, n.e., the driver of the victim E (49) who is a driver of the vehicle. For this reason, the victim “Wedted to be stamped once” is sounded, and from the victim, “M5 vehicle n.e., SM5 vehicle n.e., a woman’s m.m.’s m.’s m.’s m.’s m.’s m.’s m.’s m.’s m.’s m.’s m.’

The Defendant continued to drive the said car and set a stop in line with the stop signals at the front of the two-way elementary school crossing. However, when the injured party who scamed the Defendant resisted the vehicle at the front of the Defendant’s vehicle and resisted the vehicle from the vehicle, the Defendant left the vehicle at the front of the vehicle, left the vehicle at the front of the vehicle, left eight times the part of the victim’s vehicle at the front of the vehicle, and left the vehicle at both thereafter.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous goods as above and damaged the car of the injured party to be equivalent to KRW 909,612.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a criminal investigation report, a vehicle photograph, a quotation, a internal investigation report (an investigation into the G Blue image), G Blue image shield photographs, a certificate of hospitalization, a medical certificate, and a written opinion;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Article 10(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act mitigated by law and Article 55(1)6 of the same Act ( mentally and physically weak persons)