However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 26, 2017, at around 23:23, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) the Defendant, from the superintendent of the police station where the police box affiliated with the police station that was called out after receiving a report of 112 at the “C” restaurant parking lot located in Daegu-gun B, he expressed his desire to restrain the Defendant from assaulting other customers; and (b) the Defendant’s chest part of the said E by her hand was sealed once.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the reported case by the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (Attachment, such as a photo of damaged scene);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the full sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive for, means and consequence of a crime, circumstances after a crime, family relationship, and property status, shall be taken into

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act on the community service order;