However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 2015, the Defendant deposited the victim E in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government in KRW 100 million of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of KRW 100 million at KRW 202,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, and the deposit of KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

In doing so, “Transferr: “A”, “A”, “A”, and “the indication of credit to be transferred: F lending 100,000,000 won as to 202,00 won.”

However, in fact, the above apartment was provided with KRW 7,1250,000 among KRW 100,000 among KRW 100,000,00,000, and only the remainder of KRW 28,7550,000 among the 100,000,000, and the defendant did not have a claim for the return of the deposit of KRW 100,000 to the above apartment owner G. At the time, the defendant did not have a claim for the return of the deposit of KRW 100,00,00 to the above apartment owner G. At the time, the defendant did not have a claim for the refund of the deposit of KRW 100,00,00,000,00,00,000,00,000,00

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, received 15,00,000 won in total from the victim on August 10, 2015, under the pretext of borrowing money from the victim who was affiliated with the Defendant on August 10, 2015, as well as from May 9, 2016, the Defendant transferred 59,40,000 won in total on 15 occasions as indicated in the list of crimes in the annexed crime list.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and E;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Prosecutions of E.