beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.01.28 2013나40796

소유권이전등기

Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as follows. ① Of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, the part Nos. 4-14-19 of the judgment of the court of first instance is used; ② the part No. 5-3-4 of the judgment of the court of first instance is added to the following; ③ the “No. 10 of the 5-4 of the judgment of the court of first instance” is as follows: ③ the “No. 10 of the 10th " May 19, 2011; ④ the “B money Defendants” of the 11th 11th th th th th th th th th 6-8 of the 6th th th 6-8th th th 6-8 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows; ② Defendant B, N. B, C, C, and E, and thus, the part of the judgment on the claim against Defendant C&2’s “B” and the corresponding global E&2nd 300 of the judgment.

Even according to each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 9 through 12 (including each number), the first instance court and the fact-finding and judgment shall not be different. 【The part which was completely used 】 【The real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 through 12 and each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 13 through 16 of the same Schedule, which was owned by the defendant B, for which the provisional registration of transfer of ownership was completed on the same day under the name of November 15, 2007 for each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 13 through 16 of the same Schedule, which was owned by the defendant B (hereinafter referred to as “the real estate of this case”).

B. (b) On November 22, 2007, J rendered a provisional attachment order of KRW 956,296,063 with respect to each real property listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 to 12, as stated in the separate sheet (the above Court Order 2007Kadan51294, Nov. 26, 2007).