The facts as to the cause of the claim (Provided, That the "creditor" is the plaintiff, and the "debtor" is the defendant) are either not disputed between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the whole purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including the serial number).

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the money stated in the Disposition No. 1, unless there are special circumstances.

The defendant asserted that the representative liquidator of the defendant cannot comply with the plaintiff's claim because he was granted immunity. However, the claim of this case is not a claim against the defendant against the defendant and a claim against the representative of the defendant against the defendant. Thus, the decision of immunity against the representative individual does not affect the claim of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

The plaintiff's claim is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.