업무상배임
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who, from March 20, 201, served as the president of the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Association for the Redevelopment and Improvement of D Housing (hereinafter “the instant association”) from around March 20, 201, was engaged in the affairs of managing and executing funds of the association. Around May 12, 201, the office of the instant association on the second floor of the building of Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu in the process of converting the building into an urban renewal acceleration district, designation of the district, designation of the district, authorization for the implementation of the project, authorization for the alteration of the project, etc., and all services, such as consultation related to the authorization and permission, etc., jointly requested to F and G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F, etc.”), entered into a construction design service contract with the F and G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the total floor area of the design construction is approximately KRW 599,340 square meters, approximately 10,600,00 per square meter in total floor area, etc.
“The Defendant agreed that the total floor area of the construction has been completed on November 24, 201 with the authorization for the change of the implementation of the project and reduced by approximately 11,493 square meters in excess of the previous construction area, upon which the construction was completed on November 24, 201, the Defendant had a duty to pay only KRW 5,885,00,000, which was calculated in accordance with the above agreement and deducted from KRW 6,000,000, which is the first service price, from KRW 114,930,000, which is the first service price (=11,493 square meters x 10,000 x 10,000 x 10,000 square meters).
Nevertheless, the Defendant violated his duties and did not settle the accounts as above, and paid the full amount of KRW 6,00,000,000 from May 13, 201 to October 16, 2014 to F, etc. for the service price, thereby obtaining pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 114,930,000 in F, etc. and suffered loss equivalent to the same amount as the instant association, the victim of which was the victim.
2. Business judgment.