However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 13, 2019, around 17:00, the Defendant was sentenced to the appellate court judgment on November 28, 2019, including an accusation against 2019No111 B by the Songpa-gu Seoul Western District Court 2019No111, and on February 27, 2020, the appellate court judgment becomes final and conclusive as the judgment of the Supreme Court rendered on February 27, 2020. The Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness. On the other hand, on July 18, 2016, the Defendant tried to use the above evidence to the effect that C does not associate with B, despite the fact that he was pushed of B at the D subconference room.

The Defendant testified to the question “at the time of testimony at the first instance trial, this is the only test of the Defendant that he did not flatize the fact that he had flat at that time.” The Defendant testified to “I do not see the situation of flating flat,” and the presiding judge stated that “I would like to flat the flat and flat the flat,” and stated that “I would like to flat the flat and flat the flat of the flat, I would like to write that I would have flat the flat and flat the flat of the flat,” and stated that “I would like to flat the flat of the flat.”

However, since the defendant was directly adjacent to C and B at the time, C was well aware of the fact that C was closely aware of the body.

Accordingly, the defendant testified against his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. A written complaint filed by the police against the defendant's legal statement B, and a record thereof;

1. Application of statutes on the judgment of the appellate court, the protocol of examination of witness in the appellate court, and the protocol of examination of witness;

1. Article 152(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the relevant criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is an offense of perjury with the risk of overcoming the appropriate jurisdiction of the State and the exercise of disciplinary power.

The defendant is not guilty against B.