2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. 1) The occurrence of a traffic accident 1) the network C (hereinafter “the network”).

A) On June 3, 2011, when distributed in public cities, 10:27, a bicycle according to D and D’s hacker’s hackbro, which is an air-sectioned plane from Daejeon to the air-section. (hereinafter “1 bicycle”), and a bicycle driven by D, is “2 bicycle”.

E is a driver, while E is a Franchisa car (hereinafter referred to as “passenger car”).

) While driving the said road and driving the said road into the Daejeon At the front of the air zone, the deceased’s head and 1 bicycle going beyond the lane was placed in the front part of a passenger car, and caused the deceased to suffer injury, such as an external shocking blood, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) At the time of the instant accident, the deceased was pushed down with approximately 1.7 meters a set of passenger cars at the time of the instant accident, and the first bicycle was destroyed by the side side of hand, laying to rest, laying to rest, going on the side of the right side, and the transmission device installed on the right side of the wheels, and the vehicle volume was damaged by the front driver’s coordinate, the front driver’s side, and the driver’s seat after the driver’s seat.

B. In the instant accident involving the deceased’s hospitalized treatment and death, the Deceased died on August 7, 201, from June 3, 2011 to August 7, 2012, 416, where the Deceased was hospitalized at the G University Hospital for 416 days.

C. The Plaintiffs are legal successors of the deceased’s parents. 2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with E with respect to passenger cars.

The Defendant paid KRW 240,561,770, which is the full amount of the medical expenses incurred in the hospitalization of the Deceased at the G University Hospital.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, Eul evidence No. 1-1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs of the parties asserted that the accident of this case occurred due to the negligence of the plaintiff's driver's vehicle driven by the central line, the amount of passenger car.