beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2011.12.02 2011고합495

특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등

Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who had a representative attorney-at-law in law firm E from 2004 to the past.

F is a person who served in K through G from March 1, 1986 to December 21, 2009 through H (State), (State), I, and J (State), and L is a person who is irrelevant to F’s motive for high school.

H Share certificates 806,400 Shares hereinafter referred to as “instant share certificates”) were printed in H (State) new certificates corresponding to G (State) share certificates 806,400 shares that M purchased and held by N (State) from Austria companies, but did not yet have to be issued as soon as the Republic of Korea does not request the exchange of new shares in M (State), etc.

F continued to work for G (State) and the following F (H). The company deducted the instant share certificates and related documents kept in the company, and then received the Defendant through Q, etc. while receiving money and valuables from P (State) by using the instant share certificates from August to 9, 2009, in contact with P (State) from that time, and in contact with P (State) in order to cause a person to cause sexual intercourse with the said transaction.

On March 8, 2010, the Defendant filed a lawsuit for the delivery of sovereignty against L and Man in the mutual influence house located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and L to L, rather than directly counter-party to P (State) in the manner of realizing the right to the sovereignty of this case. However, it was suggested that it would be the most desirable that L, as a safety device, will not contain third person's water and cause criminal problems.

Accordingly, around March 2010, the Defendant re-entered L and his shares as experts in the stocks introduced by L and L, and then planned to bring a lawsuit for the delivery of share certificates against the two KK (State) that R succeeds to the share certificates of this case from her her her her her her her her son who did not possess or possess the share certificates of this case, and is false from six persons who are in the relationship of R and co-inheritors.