징계처분무효확인
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
After being appointed as a local fire assistant on February 21, 1994, the plaintiff was promoted to the local fire assistant on August 16, 200, and on October 26, 2007, and the local fire assistant on October 26, 2007. From July 6, 2010, the plaintiff was in charge of emergency driving duties while serving as the Yangcheon Fire Assistant 119 Safety Center.
On September 7, 2012, the Defendant, following the resolution of the Yangcheon Fire Station Disciplinary Committee, instructed the Plaintiff to transfer the patient whose consciousness is unknown at around 23:19 on June 11, 2012, his superior and the first responder on his first-aid service vehicle to the National University of Korea University of Korea (hereinafter “the grounds for disciplinary action within the statute of limitations”) from 35 times to 35 times in total (hereinafter “the grounds for disciplinary action within the statute of limitations”) on the ground that: (a) the Plaintiff had been working as the first-aid driver during the process of transporting the patient whose consciousness is unknown; (b) the superior and the first-aid workers had the authority to decide on the transfer of the transferred hospital to the National University of Korea; and (c) the Defendant had the first-aid vehicle operated the first-aid vehicle to the front of the National University of Korea; and (d) again, (c) the Defendant had been subject to disciplinary action within the statute of limitations of 35 times from September 28, 2009 to December 9, 2012.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant disciplinary action”). The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disciplinary action and filed an appeal review with the appeals review committee, but the said committee dismissed it on December 13, 2012.
On January 8, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking the revocation of the instant disciplinary action against the Seoul Administrative Court. However, on January 7, 2014, the Seoul Administrative Court rendered a judgment dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim on the ground that “the instant disciplinary action is not procedural defect, all of which are recognized, and that a disciplinary action is lawful as appropriate.”