When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No act of delivery, sale, fabrication, conspiracy, or possession of a trademark identical or similar to the registered trademark of another person for the purpose of using or making another person use it on goods identical or similar to the designated goods

Nevertheless, at around 14:20 on November 23, 2014, the Defendant held 27 points in the front store located in Jung-gu Seoul, Seoul, for the purpose of selling e-mail and e-mail, as indicated in the attached list of crimes, including three posts on a fake belt with the trademark identical to the trademark registered with the Korean Intellectual Property Office, without legitimate authority.

Accordingly, the Defendant infringed the trademark right of the above trademark right holder as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. An appraisal opinion;

1. Copy of the original trademark register;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of seized articles;

1. Article 93 of the Trademark Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 97-2 (1) of the Trademark Act that is confiscated;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;