상이처 일부인정 거부처분 취소
1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.
2. The Defendant’s unstable symptoms to the Plaintiff on September 23, 2015, and the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a policeman on May 12, 1990, and was an honorary police officer on December 31, 2014.
B. On January 5, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that “the slives of slives of slives of slives, slives of slives of slives, and unstable slives of slives, etc.” with the Defendant. On March 17, 2015, the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement deliberated and decided that “the slives of slives of slives of slives, slives of slives of slives, slives of slives, and slives of sl
C. On September 23, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the deliberation and resolution of the above Merit Reward Judgment Committee, and the Defendant rendered a decision that “the ground for providing distinguished services to the State” was as to “the ground for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State,” but “the imprudent sected satise and satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise sate satise satise sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate sate s
The Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit against a person who rendered distinguished services to the State and a person eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against “unscopic scopic scoptymism and acute scoptymism” (hereinafter “instant wounds”).
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4 through 6, 13, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. The plaintiff's assertion is made on February 2005.