A. Defendant B determined and lent to the Plaintiff the sum of KRW 30,00,000 as stated in the “amount” column in the “date” column as listed in the table 1 below, and the “interest rate” column in the same table as indicated in the same table was one month after the respective lending date.

(13) For each of the loans extended by Defendant B, 1, 204-10, 2005-10, 2004-10, 2005-10, 200-40-10, 2004-15, 200, 2003-039, 910, 100, 2004-10, 1004-04, 2004-04-06 910, 000, 204-204-2004-200, 2004-2004-200, 2004-204-200, 9-29-10, 200-4, 200-10, 200-4, 20007

B. Defendant C lent 40,000,000 won to the Plaintiff, as listed in the table 2 below, from May 11, 2006 to July 31, 2006.

(hereinafter) Each loan claim of Defendant C is specified with the number stated in the table 2 below. The interest rate (units: month and %) interest rate (units: %) on the date of lending (units) (units: 530,000,000 or less less than 206-07-315,000,000 or more than 40,000 [Attachment 2] / [Attachment 2] of the absence of dispute, the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 5-2, Eul evidence 12, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination as to the claim against the defendant B

A. According to the above facts, Defendant B lent a total of KRW 330,000,000 to the Plaintiff, as shown in the above Table 1, from September 8, 2003 to June 5, 2006. However, Defendant B asserts that Defendant B loaned a total of KRW 33,900,000 to the Plaintiff as follows. We examine the above arguments. 2) As to the above allegations, Defendant B lent a total of KRW 26,50,000 on June 25, 2005 to the Plaintiff, and Defendant B lent a total of KRW 33,90,000 from the limit operated by the Plaintiff on June 25, 2005.