However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

around 12:50 on February 21, 2017, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 817,” cited 2,000 won of the market price of 2,00 won in the display stand in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon as his hand, and stolen it.

around 17:45 on April 19, 2017, the Defendant: (a) entered the “H” clothes store operated by the Victim G in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon; and (b) committed theft by putting one punishment of 100 won for women, the market value of which is equivalent to KRW 99,00,000, which was the victim’s possession, and one punishment of 139,000,000, which was prepared in advance, for women’s lux.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 817"

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Written estimate "2017 Height 1728";

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. G statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 329 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment (including the fact that there has been any record of having been punished for the same crime);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the damage is relatively insignificant and the damaged goods are recovered, and that there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine);