산업안전보건법위반
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.
Defendant
If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who acts on behalf of a business owner as the head of the site office of the "E Corporation" performed by B Co., Ltd. in the Gangnam-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, and eight parcels of land, and is a person responsible for the safety and health of his employees. Defendant B Co., Ltd. is a corporation established on September 26, 2005 for the purpose of conducting civil works, construction works, construction works, etc. with its head office in the Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan, Seoan-gu, Seoan and the Seoul Special Metropolitan City City Co., Ltd., and is a business owner who performed the "E Corporation" from September 12, 2013 to the contract officer of the Daejeon Special Metropolitan City Co., Ltd. for the installation of the facilities of Daejeon Special Metropolitan
With respect to the results of the periodical supervision of enterprises with poor conversion rate in 2014 conducted by the Daejeon Regional Employment and Labor Agency on September 18, 2014:
1. Defendant A:
A. In the event that falling water is likely to pose a risk to workers on the floor, road, passage, etc. of the workplace, a business owner must take necessary measures, such as installing a protection network, but the Defendant, without installing a protection network inside the above site, allowed workers to pass and work on and from the workplace without installing the protection network.
B. Even though the employer, when assembling the steel bridge, should reinforce the cross-sections, the Defendant, despite having to reinforce the cross-sections, had the employees work without strengthening the cross-sections from the outer pairs of the above site to the employees.
C. Although a business owner has to install a wall with respect to the outer sway, double sway, or protruding system, the Defendant, without installing an outer pairer wall, made the employees work without installing an outer pairer wall. D.
In the event that the business owner assembles the moving-type system and does the work at the highest part of the system, the safety risks should be installed, despite the fact that the defendant does not install the safety risks at the highest part of the moving-type system (the second part) at the time of installing the auxiliary stairs room of the third floor above the above site.