If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 24, 2013, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement for 60 months with respect to D’s employees E of Social Services Korea Co., Ltd. and Benz E20cci F, owned by the victim company, and paid the lease fee faithfully, and the ownership until that time was owned by the victim company and could not be used by others, and the Defendant would return the vehicle if the lease fee is not paid.

However, the Defendant attempted to deliver the said vehicle to H, which was known through the husband’s G, even if he received a benz car from the victim company, to use the said vehicle, and the said H attempted to borrow the said vehicle as security through the lending company.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the employees E of the Victim Company, was issued by the Victim Company with approximately KRW 66 million on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the second public trial date);

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of G to the prosecution;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Application of the terms and conditions of the lease of motor vehicle facilities, the list of terms and conditions of the lease, and the statutes governing the repayment;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;