beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.05.24 2013고정152

상해

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On July 25, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 23:00 on July 25, 2012, the charge is a fluorous fluoral Dolle of Ulsan Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (b) followed the Defendant into a fluorous victim F (n, 44 years of age) who is his fluore and fluor; and (c) brought a dispute over the Defendant’s fluor who is fluorcing the Defendant’s fluor, and fluorcing the victim’s fluor with his fluor, and fluoral fluoring the victim’s face, leading the victim to the victim’s face

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

1) Around 23:00 on July 25, 2012, the Defendant: (a) prevented ice from smoking in the Seoul Village D Sea in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) led to the need between E and the victim F, who works therefor. (c) The victim attempted from the Defendant to go off the Defendant’s writing license used by the Defendant at his/her hand, who heard the word “unfiscing of ice.........., the Defendant tried to go off the Defendant’s flag, and the her mother was used by the victim once.

3) The victim saw the Defendant’s breath by cutting the balth, cutting the Defendant’s balth, cut the Defendant’s chest by hand, walking the Defendant’s body several times by combining it with E, and cut the Defendant’s arms with his hand. 4) The Defendant suffered from the Defendant’s joint assault with the Defendant, due to the joint assault between the victim and E, a balpted, sponsed, sponsed, sponsed, sponsed, sponsed, and sponsed with the Defendant.

나. 위 증거들 및 위 인정사실에서 알 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 피고인은 40세의 여성으로서, 44세의 여성인 피해자와 47세의 남자인 E으로부터 공동폭행을 당하게 되자 이 사건 행위에 이르게 된 점, ② 피고인의 행위는 피해자의 모자를 1회 치고, 양손으로 피해자의 멱살을 잡고, 손톱으로 피해자의 얼굴을 할퀸 정도로서 피고인이 당한 상해에 비하면 상당히 경미할 뿐 아니라, 피해자와 E의 공동폭행에...