사기
The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.
1. The summary of the facts charged is the domestic violence crime known to E by the domestic organized violence crime, which was sentenced by the Seoul High Court on October 6, 1992 to 8 years of imprisonment with prison labor for murder, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on December 23, 199, and even thereafter, there was a record that the Defendant neglected the domestic violence crime, which he was designated to be called E by the organized violence crime, and participated in this right.
The defendant puts the friendship to the surrounding people such as Pyeongtaek F, etc., and in particular, from March 2008 to March 2008, the defendant was at a disadvantage of the political power as a high school line.
G friendly part of the family department was fluent.
The Defendant was in business crisis due to police investigations, etc. of his multi-level financial companies from March 2008 to August 2008.
The F was asked by the F to the effect that the passage of the above G is changed or the police commission is changed for the purpose of police investigation.
On August 2008, the Defendant received explicit or implied solicitation from the Victim F to “accomponing the expansion of police investigation through force personnel or other ties related to the said G, etc.” from the victim F at an insulous place below Daegu, and demanded that the victim be aware of the victim’s solicitation, such as preventing the expansion of investigation through force personnel or surrounding artificial beer, etc., and that the victim would be able to accept the victim’s request, such as preventing the expansion of investigation through force personnel or surrounding artificial beer, etc., and that the Defendant demanded KRW 5
However, the fact was that there was no intention or ability to accept the victim's request, such as preventing the expansion of investigation, and there was no intention or ability to pay to related personnel, etc. for the victim.
On August 26, 2008, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received a delivery of KRW 200 million total of KRW 20,000,000 from the victim of the damage; (c) received KRW 200,000 from the financial account in the H’s name designated by the Defendant; and (d) received KRW 200,000 from the remittance of KRW 20,000 to the financial account in the H’s name, and received KRW 40,000,000 from
2. The judgment of this Court.