(a) A resident or a nonresident who intends to import a means of payment exceeding 10,000 U.S. dollars shall report to the head of the competent customs office;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without filing such a report, entered from China to Incheon Airport on January 16, 201, carried KRW 66,00,000 as the loan of the B Co., Ltd., a representative director, carried in and carried in the Defendant’s home room (2) around May 15, 201, carrying KRW 788,00,000 in the same manner as that of the Defendant, and (3) carried KRW 1,026,00,00 in the same manner as of March 8, 2012, and imported the payment method exceeding KRW 10,000 by carrying KRW 840,00,000 in the same manner as of April 27, 2012.

B. Defendant B, a representative director of the Defendant, was the Defendant Company A.

the date, time, and place mentioned in paragraph 1 above

As stated in paragraph (1), a payment method exceeding 10,00 U.S. dollars was imported without reporting to the customs collector.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the records of this case, it is insufficient to readily conclude that Defendant A brought into Korea with won as indicated in the facts charged in this case at the time of entering the Republic of Korea only with the evidence submitted by the prosecutor.

① It is determined that the Chinese traffic bank exchange table submitted to the Seoul Customs office is forged or falsified with evidentiary materials exchanged by Defendant A in Korean won in China.

② When Defendant A was investigated by the Seoul Customs due to Defendant B Company’s non-registered exchange business suspicion, Defendant A consulted with the staff D who was in charge of the Seoul Customs-related business on behalf of the Seoul Customs-related business, that “the most favorable to arranging it to be carried in foreign currency.” As above, Defendant A submitted to the Seoul Customs-related office a copy of the Chinese Transport Bank’s Schedule with false content.

3. Thus, the facts charged of this case are reasonable.