The Defendant is the president of the “B apartment house” and the relationship with the victim C is a neighbor.

On August 27, 2017, the Defendant continued to divide the level into the victim’s house B apartment house 301, 702, 201, 201, and 702, and the said victim entered the victim’s house without the heater’s permission, and intruded the victim’s residence, such as entering the victim’s house without the heater’s permission.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the occurrence of an accident, a written statement of the victim, and an on-site photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Article 319 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 319 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the following favorable circumstances) of the suspended sentence, the Defendant’s acknowledgement of the criminal facts of the instant case and against himself/herself, and agreed with the victim, the economic situation appears to have not been a continuous judicial branch, and there is no record of being subject to special criminal punishment except for those subject to punishment once for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act in 2001, and other various circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing as shown in the argument of the instant case.