Text

1. The Defendant’s payment order with executory power of 2016 tea 74975 dated October 20, 2016 against Seoul Southern District Court (Seoul Southern District Court).

Reasons

1. Since movable property indicated in the separate list indicating the claim is owned by the plaintiff, it is unreasonable that the defendant seizes the above movable property by compulsory execution based on the original copy of the payment order (Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2016JJ 2016M 74975).