When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

From May 2015 to June 201, the Defendant: “The Victim G is a police officer in Busan and is a non-wheeled person.” The Victim G is a police officer in Busan. The Victim is a police officer in Busan.

A direct verification was made.

The same shall apply to “private life”, “private life shall be disturbed, and shall not be a private window.”

The term "Igndo Da. The injured party G is divorced and thrown away from the wind.

“The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F (a police officer and non-wheeled person in G in this area) from the Defendant.

The same shall apply to those which disrupt privacy and are not a private window.

G Contents that the phrase “a person who has been divorced and thrown away from the wind to the wind of the wind,” was directly made.

1. The witness H’s legal statement (around August 24, 2015, the husband of the G, the phone call demanding the Defendant to be subject to an apology, and the Defendant’s statement of the same criminal facts as the Defendant’s judgment, which was erroneous on the part of the Defendant’s judgment)

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a witness G’s legal statement (a police officer’s statement that does not constitute facts constituting an offense, such as the fact that the police officer was a deadly related person and is not divorced by violence at front and rear convenience

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 307 (2) of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;