beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2016.09.22 2016고정29

사기등

Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000 and by a fine of KRW 1,50,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants in violation of the Act on Fraudulent and Subsidy Management (unfair receipt of subsidies in 2012) are residents of the village in the Republic of Korea, E is the development chairperson of the above village, F is a former head of the above village from 2012 to 2014, G is a person who has been a head of the above village from 2015 to 2015, and H is a person who operates “I” to supply raw timber to the above village for the purpose of growing sweak mushrooms, etc.

On April 2012, the Defendants had no intent or ability to implement a subsidized project (referred to as a riparian zone support project - a project to purchase raw timber in D village in 2012). However, the Defendants applied for a false subsidy to the Environment Office of the Yeongsan River basin in the victim and conspired to receive it from the residents of the village.

E, according to the above public invitation as of Apr. 2012, 2012, E requested that “the account statement was prepared to the effect that the subsidy was given to a village as much as the subsidy was given,” and the F sought H on Apr. 20, 2012 to the above I located in the JJ of the Jeonnam-gun, Seoul. The fact that H was on the F, who claimed for himself, was on the ground of D village business, and was on the ground that he was on the supply of mushroom raw timber for the use of D village business, but was on the ground that he was on the supply of KRW 42,42,00,00, as if he was on the supply of KRW 42,00.

F) On June 28, 2012, F submitted to the Yeongsan Seomjin Environment Office an application for subsidy grant, etc. to the effect that “F would jointly purchase sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sped sponsed sped spons

As a result, the Defendants conspired to deceive the victim's Yeongsan River Environment Office, thereby deceiving the victim's property.