2. Defendant A did not have any history of criminal punishment; Defendant B did not have any history of criminal punishment except for the punishment once by a fine in the past; Defendant B deposited KRW 3 million in the original trial; Defendant B deposited KRW 5 million in the original trial; Defendant B deposited KRW 5 million in the original trial; and 1.5 million in the original trial, respectively, in favor of the Defendants.

However, the Defendants are going to enter the university as a special admission of the victims to the victims of the victims.

In light of the fact that the crime of this case was committed actively and systematically, the nature of the crime of this case is not good, and the victim appears to have suffered significant mental damage as well as property damage, and accordingly, the injured person wants to punish the Defendants, and taking into account the following factors: the Defendants’ age, sexual behavior, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, it is difficult to view that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals by the Defendants are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.