도로법위반
The defendant is innocent.
The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the defendant's employee C violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle of the road management authority by loading the freight exceeding the limit on the reduction of the D vehicle on the road in front of the enzymal gymal gymal gymal gymal gymal site at the time of port around 6:30 on May 12, 1994.
However, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993, and amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995) which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged retroactively loses its effect according to the Constitutional Court's decision of unconstitutionality on Dec. 29, 201.
Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.