A. Facts of recognition 1) Plaintiff A (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”) are limited to “Plaintiff” in paragraph (1).

on August 25, 2015, the D Hospital run by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”)

(2) The Plaintiff A’s spouse is the Plaintiff’s spouse. (2) The method of surgery is to open the head bones and approach the satisfy to the satfy and approach the satfy to the satfy through the satfy by using the satfry satfying method and the satfying method.

The Defendant Hospital selected the opening of the therapy, and performed an operation by approaching the fest eye at the right eye, and removed only 10% of the fatal fat, and then suspended the operation of the fatal fatal, performed the fatal fatal, and fatd two fats.

The plaintiff lost the vision of the right side of the normal eye immediately after the operation.

3) After that, the Plaintiff, while making a transitional observation at the Defendant Hospital on November 2, 2015, was given an operation to remove the other brain sewage species by a method of going through the contact with the F Hospital, and subsequently received the relevant treatment at G Hospital. (4) The operation to remove the male of the large-scale brain sewage systems is an operation with a high risk of psychotropic damage.

After this operation, psychotropic damage is mainly caused by damage to the cerebrovasculars that are supplied to the megales in the process of removing the species during the surgery or in the process of gambling to ensure the field of vision, or by the mechanical pressure of the megale in and around the megathal or the megathal in and around the megale.

In the case of the plaintiff, the brain side was not serious in the vicinity of the operation, and the blood side was successful.

5 As seen above, the removal of thyroids surgery is highly likely to cause damage to the eyesight, so it is a compromise with an internal medicine specialist in advance to prevent any damage to the thyroids during the surgery.