1. The status of the relevant persons and the background C of the case were the head of the relevant D Gun, who was the final approving authority for the cadastral reexamination project ordered by the D Gun. The Defendant was a public official of Grade VI belonging to the D Gun Office from January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2016. The person who was in charge of the overall cadastral reexamination project conducted by the D Gun was a public official of Grade VI belonging to the D Gun office, and the person who was in charge of the overall cadastral reexamination project conducted by the D Gun. The F was a director of the cadastral surveying company located in the remaining G, and the said company was selected as a joint executor of the cadastral reexamination project for the I district around April 2015, and around April 2016, the company was designated as a joint executor of the cadastral reexamination project conducted by the J and K Gun.

2. Criminal facts;

A. On April 2015, 2015, H was selected as a joint executor of the cadastral re-audit project for the IS on April 1, 2015, and “if the head of the Gun does not obtain personnel approval from E to the end of the military unit’s number.”

Does it be possible to personnel;

It is difficult to take an intermediate position even in the middle.

Recognizing the word "", the head of C/C intended to deliver money for the purpose of soliciting convenience so that the payment of the project costs, etc. can be carried out well-being.

F On April 27, 2015, the F sent 10 million won to E at the mutually influorous restaurant in the Cheongho-dong, the Cheongpo-si, the Cheongpo-si, the Cheongpo-si, under the above circumstances, and delivered 10 million won to E.

E is kept in the office of the head of the D military office located in the Republic of Korea before the Ha of the same month by receiving money from C for personnel expenses related to the above projects from H of the intellectual re-investigation company.

The report was made.

The author instructed E to immediately deliver the above money to the defendant who is a non-performance secretary, and again the defendant to receive the above money from E.

Accordingly, the defendant.