When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On August 17, 2017, around 23:46, the Defendant interfered with his/her business: (a) was boarding D urban buses operated by the victim C at the bus stops located in the Young-do Do Do Do dong-gu, Busan on August 18, 2017; and (b) came to the end point of the bus located in Busan Young-do E around 00:10 on August 18, 2017; (c) so, the Defendant was leaving the end point of the bus.

In order to hear the word "", the victim is unable to use the word "shacker, flachie, or flachie".

“.......” and “......?????????????????????

When refusing to stop the vehicle with sound and to stop, the victim could not return the bus fare to the company and stop the vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendant, upon receiving a report around 00:34 on August 18, 2017, interfered with the management of vehicles by force until the police officers dispatched were forced to leave the vehicle.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, on the date and at the place specified in paragraph 1 above, arrested him as a current offender who interfered with the duties from G police officers affiliated with the Yongdo Police Station F police box for the said reason, he would be out of the rank, and it would be easy that he was killed, killed, killed, or killed.

“Along with the sound, the part of the left part of the said G and the elbow part of the said G was made once by drinking.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate performance of duties such as handling 112 reports and arresting flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the respective police statements protocol laws to C and G;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties), and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which interferes with another person’s business, is under the influence of alcohol.