When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 27, 2017, around 22:51, the Defendant: (a) was a driver of a taxi and a person under the influence of alcohol carried out within the Dong-gu Daejeon Police Station D police station located in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon; (b) paid the fare of the taxi to arbitration of the security guards belonging to the said police station; and (c) was in possession of a horse that had refused to return to the Republic of Korea upon the termination of the trial cost, and was urged to return to the Republic of Korea on the floor of the police box; and (d) committed assault to the above security guards E, for about five minutes, by taking advantage of the desire, such as “a ice fice fling. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order by police officers as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement in the investigation report (Attachment ofCCTV image images);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in which statements made by the police in relation to E are recorded;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reference to the reasoning of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the degree of exercise of tangible power, the police officer’s wife of the victimized police officer, the crime during the period of double-class repeated crime, and the absence of the same criminal record.