성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(공중밀집장소에서의추행)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case without committing an indecent act against the victim is erroneous in misconception of facts.
2. Determination
가. 원심의 판단 원심은, 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 사정들, 즉 피해자는 수사기관에서부터 원심 법정에 이르기까지 일관되게, ‘피해자의 오른쪽 엉덩이에 뾰족한 것이 닿는 느낌이 들었고, 처음에는 가방인 줄 알았으나 점차 따뜻한 느낌이 들고 촉감이 이상해서 뒤를 돌아보았더니 피고인이 황급히 들고 있던 가방으로 피고인의 성기 부분을 가렸다’는 취지로 진술하였는데, 피고인의 행위, 피해자의 피해 내용, 범행 전후의 상황에 대한 증인의 진술이 일관되고 구체적이며, 달리 위 증인의 진술에 허위가 개재될 특별한 사정이 있다고 보기 어렵고, 법정 진술 태도 등에 비추어 범죄사실에 관한 피해자의 진술에 신빙성이 인정되므로 피고인이 피해자를 추행한 사실을 인정할 수 있다고 판단하였다.
B. The above judgment of the court below is based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below. ① When considering the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below's judgment, i.e., ① the victim's indecent act committed by the defendant, and her her her her son was found to have her son and her son was her son and her son was her son, but the her her son was her son and her son was her son, and the victim stated that there was no her son or son, ② the victim was her son, but the victim was her son, but her son was her son, so it seems that the victim could have sufficiently known the victim's her her son's son, and ③ the victim was her her son's son's son and her son was her great sound.