근로기준법위반등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the court below is unreasonable as it is too unfasible to the extent that the sentence (2 million won in penalty) imposed by the court below is too unfased.
2. In full view of the arguments in the instant case and the reasons for sentencing indicated in the record, the lower court’s sentencing against the Defendant appears to have been appropriately determined by fully considering all the circumstances, including the various reasons for sentencing asserted by the Prosecutor, and no special circumstance exists to the extent that the lower court’s sentencing is to be changed.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure; however, the court below’s change “Labor Standards Act” to “former Labor Standards Act (amended by Act No. 15108, Nov. 28, 2017) under Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure to “Ex officio pursuant to Article 25(1).”