If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 96,000 won.

On June 19, 2014, at around 19:05, the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, was able to avoid disturbance for about 10 minutes, such as “E”, which was operated by the victim D in C, and “E”, which was frighten, frighten, in this context, so as to drive away customers, and driving away from f, who was the wife of the victim who was engaged in food, and driving away from f, who was the wife of the victim who was engaged in the food.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's operation of the restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (to select a fine in consideration of all the circumstances, including the fact that his/her mistake has been repented through the life of confinement for that period, and the criminal records of the accused);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;