When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 27, 2016, the Defendant and C received a demand from the injured party E to calculate the drinking value after drinking alcohol at the F main point operated by the injured party E at around 02:08.

Accordingly, the defendant and C have problems in the drinking value.

On the other hand, the Defendant stated that “I would not calculate the drinking value” to a male guest who found the above main point at the time of mashing, the Defendant met the time to “I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am am I am I am I am I am am I am am I am I am am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with C to interfere with the victim's main business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of Chapter 1 to CDs in which CCTV images and images are reproduced;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act and Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;