If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 16:40 on September 13, 2012, the Defendant driven a electric power plant at the entrance intersection at the entrance and exit of the Jindo-Eup, Seocho-gu, Seoul, to turn to the left from the Seoul from the military official's jurisdiction.

Since there is a signal, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive safely in accordance with good faith.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left by reason of occupational negligence in violation of the signal and shocked the fronter of the E-motor vehicle driven by D (Nam, 46 years of age) who was driven by D (Nam, 46 years of age) in accordance with the signals from the right angle on the left side of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused damage to the reputation of the head part that requires approximately three weeks of treatment to the victim F (mainam and 3 years of age) who was on board the same line of duty as above by negligence, and suffered injury to the victim G (mainam and 2 years of age) such as a breathy that requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Statements made on witnesses D in the second protocol of the trial;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a survey report on the actual condition, and an intersection signal signal display;

1. Application of each medical certificate (F) and each medical certificate (G) statute;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment imposed on a person who violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against which the principal is heavier);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court of this case’s guilty ground of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, stating that H, who was the witness of the instant accident, passed through the intersection from the investigative agency to the instant court.