2. The fact that the defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected in the judgment is favorable.

However, in full view of all other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, background of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is deemed reasonable and is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s wrongful assertion of sentencing is without merit, on the grounds that the Defendant’s arbitrary use of the vehicle owned by the victimized company as security, and embezzlement is not good. The Defendant’s arbitrary use of the vehicle owned by the victimized company, and did not receive any remedy from the victimized company, and that the damage was not recovered at all, and that the records, including two times of suspended sentence of imprisonment.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.