도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentence (10 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment defendant reflects his fault.
In other words, the Defendant again did not drive a drinking and disposed of his own vehicle.
However, the measured defendant's blood alcohol concentration is very rough and high, and the defendant caused an accident due to drinking.
The Defendant has been punished for driving alcohol twice, and even during the period of repeated crime, the Defendant committed the instant crime.
In full view of such circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the crime, various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant pleadings, including the circumstances after the crime was committed, the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable.
3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.