If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On July 12, 2012, the Defendant arbitrarily removed the attachment indication attached to the seized object attached at the above residence on the same day as E and moved the seized object to a non-permanent location, even though the enforcement officer D, who belongs to the Jung-gu District Court, delegated the execution of the creditor Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd., with the execution of the creditor Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd., the Defendant seized the corporeal movables of 9 points, such as the air conditioners in the Defendant’s residence, based on the original copy of the decision on seizure of corporeal movables of 2012 and 4082 of the above court.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with E, damaged the indication of the sealing or seizure or other compulsory disposition conducted by the public official in relation to his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of each police interrogation protocol against the accused (including the questioning part);

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Report on attachment of corporeal movables, report on inspection of seized objects, and report on impossibility of auction of corporeal movables;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on filing a complaint, application for goods of modern Capital, and payment order;

1. Article 140 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;