2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16093, Jan. 1,

On July 27, 2016, around 21:00, the Defendant received 1.30,000 won in the price for sexual traffic from the son of a male employee who is a female employee and had D perform sexual intercourse from that time on July 27, 2016, and from that time, the Defendant received 1.30,000 won in the price for sexual traffic.

7. Until December 28, 200, it received 130,000 won from the unspecific number of male descendants in the above sexual traffic business establishment as the price for sexual traffic and let D and E act of sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant has arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of E, D, F, and G;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A report on the control of a business place;

1. Application of investigative reports (Reporting on calculation of the profits from the sexual traffic) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.