도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 1.5 million won;
2. 50,000 won where the defendant does not pay the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who drives a vehicle BM520.
1. Around 08:00 on January 3, 2012, the Defendant driven the said car and proceeded at approximately 20-30km in the direction of the external axis in the direction of the central intersection of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city
At that time, the signal, etc. is not installed, and the traffic control is not performed, so there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is a cross-section by reducing the speed or temporarily stopping and to prevent the accident in advance by driving the motor vehicle safely.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and was driven by the victim C (the 49-year old) who was driving on the left side from the right side of the proceeding direction to the left side by negligence, and received the front side of the passenger car by the defendant's driving.
Ultimately, even if the Defendant caused physical damage equivalent to KRW 680,00 of the repair cost, such as the exchange of front-time vehicles of the victim C by occupational negligence as above, he did not take any measure in the accident site without leaving the vehicle alone.
2. Although a person who has taken over a motor vehicle applies for the registration of the transfer of the ownership of the motor vehicle to the Mayor/Do Governor as prescribed by Presidential Decree, the defendant purchased the said motor vehicle from a person who was in a fire on December 13, 201 and operated the said motor vehicle in the Kim Sea by January 3, 2012, and did not make the registration of the transfer of ownership of the motor vehicle without any justifiable reason.
3. The automobiles which are not covered by mandatory insurance are built even though they are prohibited from being operated on the road, and the Defendant operated the car in the city of Kimhae at the same date and time as the above paragraph 2 above.
Summary of Evidence
1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;
1. Statement to C by the police;
1.The teaic reference (B);