When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 10, 2016, at around 12:10, the Defendant worked as the former employee in Seo-gu Daegu C Victim D (L, 38 years of age) this cafeteria operated by the Defendant, and then dismissed the Defendant’s complaint that “I am feas, F (for example), I amfas, F (for example), I amfas, I amfas, I amfas, I amfas, I amfas, I amfas, I amfas, I amfas, I amfas, I amfas, I amfas, but amfas, I amfas, I amfas, I amfas.

It interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force over about about 10 minutes from about 12:20 minutes of the same day by taking the large amount of desire.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;