If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. At around 18:03 on January 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) laid down a fluorial fluor in the second floor E-II store managed by the victim D, and then entered the fluoring room and removed the theft prevention device attached to the fluor in the fluoring fluor, and cut off a fluor in a manner that deviates from the store without leaving and calculating it out of the fluor; and (b) cut off a fluor in a way that deviates from the store.

2. On January 22, 2015, the Defendant removed the theft prevention equipment for male use at the first floor burial above E in the same manner as that of paragraph (1), and cut off nitroit amounting to KRW 200,000 and the market price.

3. On January 25, 2015, the Defendant removed a theft prevention device for male use at the above E1st floor store in the same manner as that of paragraph (1) and cut off nitroit amounting to KRW 238,000 and the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. According to the judgment CCTV images on the assertion that the Defendant did not commit each crime under paragraphs 1 and 2 of the above facts, such as the CCTV-cap photographs, the following facts can be acknowledged: (a) the Defendant saw the luxa and the luxaet on January 14, 2015 and carried the luxa book; and (b) the luxa book was not found in the luxa; (c) on January 222, 2015, the luxa had only one lux and went in the luxa room; and (d) found the luxa and found the luxa in the luxa room; and (e) the fact that the Defendant was found to have only one luxa and the luxa in the luxbbbba, and did not purchase two luxabbbbbbbba; and (e) it is difficult for the Defendant to believe that the remainder was placed in the luxbbba, and the facts of the criminal facts under Paragraph 12.

Application of Statutes

1. Criminal facts;