대여금
1. The Defendant: (a) on May 1, 201, to the designated parties, including the Plaintiff (Appointeds) each of KRW 77,542,50, and the Defendant on May 1, 2011.
1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;
2. Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act (Judgment by public notice) of the applicable provisions of Acts;
3. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) sought payment of damages for delay from February 11, 2011, which is the date on which the loan certificate was drawn up with respect to KRW 77,542,50 (the amount equivalent to USD 155,085,00,000 in total) from each of the 77,542,50 won (the amount equivalent to USD 150,000). However, according to each of subparagraphs 1 to 4 of the evidence No. 2-1, the Defendant’s obligation on the loan certificate was recognized as of April 30, 201, and the Defendant appears to be liable for delay from May 1, 201, which comes due to the expiration of the time limit. Thus, there is no evidence to deem that the Defendant delayed the Defendant’s obligation to pay damages for delay to the Plaintiff on or before April 30, 2011. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.