However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 31, 2017, the Defendant was working at C convenience stores located in Mapo-si B, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si on July 31, 2017.

On the ground that the victim D(23) who is a part-time life victim respondeds to the defendant who ordered tobacco, the victim abusedd the victim's face on one occasion by saying, "I am I am I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am.)."

Summary of Evidence

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of convenience points ctv images cd. 1

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order - The degree of damage is relatively excessive; the defendant has no record of having been sentenced to a suspended sentence or more; disadvantageous circumstances: The defendant has no record of being punished for the same crime, such as assault in 2012 and assault in 2014; and the defendant has a record of being punished for each fine due to interference with business affairs in 2014;